Stutter-Steps on Financial ‘Bailout’ Plan Roil the Markets
Panic gripped equity and credit markets two weeks ago as a series of major financial institutions either went under or were “rescued” by the federal government. Some relief was provided the following day when news leaked out that the Treasury and the Fed were crafting a big plan to rescue the U.S. and global economies from financial Armageddon.
Both the Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, joined at times by the SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, spent much of last week on Capitol Hill and at the White House, and President Bush made a series of public statements to stress the extreme seriousness of the situation and to rally public support for the plan that had been presented and defended by Paulson and Bernanke.
Unfortunately, the financial rescue plan was quickly dubbed a “Wall Street Bailout Plan,” an incredibly inaccurate and inflammatory handle.
This characterization not only made it virtually impossible to rally public support for the plan, it also cleared the way for political wrangling in Washington over self-serving issues or ideological principles — just weeks before the national elections.
As a result, the proposed $700 billion financial rescue plan that apparently had broad bipartisan support went down in flames in the House of Representatives on Sept. 29, provoking another massive stock market contraction and a deep freeze in credit markets here and abroad.
Equity markets staged a partial rebound the next day as battered House members in both parties held open the possibility of a near-term compromise on an amended package. Meanwhile, the Senate actually went ahead with passage of a similar plan on the evening of Oct. 1, effectively handing the ball back to the beleaguered House.
A number of constructive amendments have been made to the original Treasury-Fed rescue plan during the past two weeks, and we’re assuming that an amended plan makes its way into law in the very near term.
Enactment certainly will not ensure immediate repair of credit markets or quick economic recovery, but outright failure in the House would ensure a deep recession and a major financial market meltdown. [return to top]
|