May 10, 2006

Steering Committee
R. Randy Lee, Chair
Karl Schelling, Vice-Chair
Ronald Agulnick
Virginia Albrecht
Kenneth Bley
Michael Fink
Michael Gross
Marc Kaplin
Robert Washburn

Third Circuit Court Issues Decision Involving Substantive Due Process Claims
Supreme Court Forwards Federal Rule Amendments to Congress
Nebraska Supreme Court Upholds Impact Fee Ordinance
State Court Rulings on Impact Fees
New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Argument on Eminent Domain
Eminent Domain Decisions Around the Nation
Recent State Legislative Activity on Eminent Domain Bills
NAHB’s Eminent Domain Toolkit Now Available
Florida Inclusionary Zoning Case to Watch
City in Texas Finally Settles Long-Running Downzoning Case
Miscellaneous Federal Court Updates
Miscellaneous State Court Updates
Federal & State Legislative Updates
Oral Argument Transcripts From 3 Supreme Court Wetlands Cases
Fourth Circuit Denies Appeal Under IQA Finding No Standing
Welcome New LANDS Members
17th Annual LANDS Roundtable & Workshop a Great Success!
From the Editor
Contact the NAHB Legal Staff
Subscribe to NAHB
e-Newsletters
E-mail Our Editor
NAHB Home Page
. Browse Other NAHB
e-Newsletters
. Manage Your Subscription
. Browse NAHB Books and Periodicals
. Search Back Issues
Print This Article
Print All Articles

  Recent State Legislative Activity on Eminent Domain Bills

In recent months, several states have enacted eminent domain legislation amending definitions of what constitutes “blighted property” and outlining circumstances when states will prohibit the use of eminent domain.  For examine, Idaho’s governor recently signed legislation that prohibits using eminent domain to acquire private property for public use if the public use is merely a pretext for transferring the property to a private party for economic development.  Several states have proposed amendments to their constitutions to address eminent domain issues.  For example, in Georgia, if the voters ratify the amendment in H.R. 1306, the bill will require local governing bodies to approve the exercise of eminent domain in condemning private property for redevelopment purposes. In New Mexico, the governor vetoed legislation that would have prohibited state or local public bodies from condemning private property if the taking was to promote private or commercial development.

In all, seventeen states have adopted eminent domain-related legislation and/or amendments to their state constitutions. One state filed a resolution with the Secretary of State’s Office and in a second, proposed legislation has passed the senate.  In five states, bills are waiting for gubernatorial approval.

Please click here for a complete summary compiled by NAHB's State & Local Government Affairs Staff.


[ return to top ]

For more information or to contact us directly, please visit www.NAHB.org l ©2006, National Association of Home Builders

To unsubscribe, change your e-mail address, or manage your subscription, CLICK HERE